Drawing for ROYALL WALL SYSTEMS, INC.

USPTO serial 75729680

ROYALL WALL SYSTEMS, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYALL WALL SYSTEMS, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANK L. KUBLER

FRANK L KUBLER LAW OFFICE OF FRANK L KUBLER13261 SW 54TH COURTMIAMI LAKES, FL 33027UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007EQUIPMENT FOR FORMING CONCRETE BUILDING WALLS AND CONCRETE MODULAR UNITS, NAMELY, CONCRETE FINISHING MACHINES AND CONCRETE MIXERSACTIVE—
019CONCRETE BUILDING AND CONCRETE MODULAR UNITSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 29, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2001MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2000OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 17, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance