USPTO serial 75730041
THINGAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with THINGAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CAMARILLO, CA
VENTURA, CA
Ventura, CA
Ventura, CA
Ventura, CA
VENTURA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig A. Gelfound
Craig A. Gelfound ARENT FOX LLP555 WEST FIFTH STREET, 48TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90013-1065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PARTS OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, NAMELY, ARMATURES CONSISTING OF INDUCTION COILS AND USED AS THE ELECTRICAL COIL FOR CONVERTING ELECTRICAL ENERGY TO ROTARY OR LINEAR MOTOR MOTION, ALL SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | Jul 14, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THINGAP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THINGAP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by G&G Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by G&G Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by G&G Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THINGAP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named THINGAP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |