USPTO serial 75730528
BUYPLASTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUYPLASTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | provision of internet-based collaborative product design, product development, and data management services that enable enterprises to integrate computer applications and computer data within the enterprise and with the enterprise's customers, partners and suppliers to facilitate business processes in the plastics industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |