USPTO serial 75730865
RAVISENT TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2526513Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2002
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAVISENT TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MALVERN, PA
LAS VEGAS, NV
Malvern, PA
LAS VEGAS, NV
LAS VEGAS, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned E. Barlas
NED E BARLAS DIVICORE INC1 GREAT VALLEY PKWYMALVERN, PA 19355UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for digital audio and video processing for incorporation by original equipment manufacturers in personal computers and consumer electronics products; embedded software licensed to original equipment manufacturers for digital video and digital audio processing for use in digital versatile disc players, televisions, high definition televisions, digital televisions, digital video recorders, satellite broadcast television receivers, and set top boxes; embedded software licensed to original equipment manufacturers for navigating a global computer network; electronic components, namely, semiconductors; parts for personal computers, namely, integrated circuits and integrated circuit boards sold to original equipment manufacturers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 1999 |
| 042 | Design for others in the field of engineering, namely, designing semiconductor devices, integrated circuit boards, graphics cards, video circuit cards and parts for digital versatile disc players, digital video recorders, television sets, television components, set top boxes, consumer electronics products, and embedded software for use in connection with the foregoing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAVISENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by REVISENT IP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Divicore Inc
- Other trademarks owned by REVISENT IP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by REVISENT IP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RAVISENT TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |