USPTO serial 75730930
BIKE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIKE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chris P. Perque
CHRIS P PERQUE AKIN, GUMP,STRAUSS,HAUER & FELD,L.L.P816 CONGRESS AVE STE 1900AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others in the field of bicycles and cycling sports through the dissemination of advertising for others via a global computer information network; providing on-line auction services featuring bicycles, bicycle parts, accessories and apparel via a global computer information network; providing on-line retail and wholesale store services and on-line ordering services in the field of bicycles and cycling sports via a global computer network and providing an on-line gift registry and directory featuring merchandise in the field of bicycles and cycling sport | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2000 |
| 041 | Providing information in the field of cycling sports, namely news articles, event previews, athlete profiles, travel guides, training advice and related information via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |