Drawing for HYPRED

USPTO serial 75731202

HYPRED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPRED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW N FREDBECK

ANDREW N FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in the dairy and agro-alimentary industriesACTIVE—
003Soaps and solutions for descaling, scaling, cleaning and degreasing of equipment used for collecting and transporting milkACTIVE—
005All-purpose disinfectants for animal milking apparatus, cows' teats and animals' udders, equipment used for collecting and transporting milk, surfaces, floors and vehicles; all for use in the dairy and agro-alimentary industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 4, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance