USPTO serial 75731212
JOHN STEINBECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 4, 2002
- Examiner
- MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JOHN STEINBECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STEINBECK HERITAGE FOUNDATION, THE
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by STEINBECK HERITAGE FOUNDATION, THE
STEINBECK HERITAGE FOUNDATION, THE
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by STEINBECK HERITAGE FOUNDATION, THE
STEINBECK HERITAGE FOUNDATION, THE
Ossining, NY
Other trademarks owned by STEINBECK HERITAGE FOUNDATION, THE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin
Mitchell E. Radin Collen IP Intellectual Property Law80 South Highland AvenueTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOssining, NY 10562Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STEINBECK HERITAGE FOUNDATION, THE
- Other trademarks owned by STEINBECK HERITAGE FOUNDATION, THE
- Other trademarks owned by STEINBECK HERITAGE FOUNDATION, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named JOHN STEINBECK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |