USPTO serial 75731274
IPA-NIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPA-NIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH BAILEY WELLS
PAULA J KRASNY BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPHCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, belts, blazers, blouses, cardigans, coats, dresses, dungarees, jackets, jeans, jumpers, leggings, miniskirts, pants, pantsuits, shirts, pullovers, scarves, shawls, sweat shirts, shorts, skirts, slacks, suits, gym suits, sweat suits, sweaters, t-shirts, tops, trousers, turtlenecks, uniforms, vests, and waistcoats; headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |