Drawing for WILD RED ALE

USPTO serial 75731677

WILD RED ALE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILD RED ALE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Micheline Kelly Johnson

MICHELINE KELLY JOHNSON BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN & CALDWELL1800 REPUBLIC CTR633 CHESTNUT STCHATTANOOGA, TN 37450-1800

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032aleACTIVEApr 30, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 18, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 8, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 3, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 23, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 23, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 23, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance