USPTO serial 75731752
GLOSS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOSS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLEY A. MORADIAN
LESLEY A MORADIAN THE ESTEE' LANDER COMPANIES INC767 5TH AVE 42ND FLNEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH CRYSTALS, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, FIZZING BATH BALLS, BATH SOAP, BODY SCRUBS, NON-MEDICATED FOOT CARE LOTION, DEODORANT, ANTI-PERSPIRANT, SHAVING CREAM, SHAVING FOAM, SHAVING LOTION, SHAVING BALM, PRE-SHAVE PREPARATIONS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, MATTE EYE PENCILS, MATTE EYEBROW PENCILS, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM, MATTE LIP PENCILS; POWDER BLUSH, MATTE FOUNDATION MAKEUP; TOILETRIES, NAMELY, FACIAL MAKEUP AND EYE MAKEUP REMOVER, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL CONDITIONER, NAIL STRENGTHENER, CUTICLE MOISTURIZING CREAM, CUTICLE REMOVING PREPARATION; FRAGRANCES, NAMELY, EAU DE PERFUME, EAU DE TOILETTE AND PERFUME FOR WOMEN, AND AFTERSHAVE, FRAGRANCED AFTERSHAVE LOTIONS, COLOGNE AND EAU DE TOILETTE FOR MEN, POTPOURRI; SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NON-MEDICATED FACE, BODY, ANTI-WRINKLE, SKIN RENEWAL AND BLEMISH CREAMS, SKIN CLEANSER, EYE CREAM, SUN BLOCK PREPARATIONS, SUN SCREEN PREPARATIONS, SUNTANNING PREPARATIONS, AFTER-SUN MOISTURIZING CREAMS AND GELS, LIP TREATMENT CREAM, FACIAL MASKS, FACIAL SCRUBS, SKIN MOISTURIZER, SKIN TONER, HAND MOISTURIZER, FACIAL TONER, BODY TONER, FACIAL SOAP, BODY SOAP; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR MOUSSE, HAIR SUNSCREEN | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | CANDLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOSS.COM LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Gloss.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOSS.COM LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BLUE ACQUISITION LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named GLOSS.COM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |