USPTO serial 75732061
TECH CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECH CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
2031 CC Haarlem, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT C ROSS JR
HERBERT C ROSS JR OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLPTHE CHRYSLER E BLDG666 3RD AVE STE 1900NEW YORK, NY 10017-4011Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | essential oils for personal use; cosmetics, namely, foaming facial cleanser, skin toner, eye makeup remover, moisturizing skin lotion, moisturizing skin cream, soothing moisture skin mask, clarifying skin mask, eye mask, eye cream, night cream, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, body lotion, anti-aging cream, sun block cream, sun screen cream, suntanning cream, facial exfoliating cream, non-medicated lip treatment cream, tinted skin moisturizer, self tanning lotions; color cosmetics, namely, foundations, concealer, loose face and body powder, compact face powder, powder blush, cream blush, eyeshadow, cream eyeshadow, eyeliner, mascara, eyebrow powder, eyebrow gloss, lipstick, lip pencils, lip gloss, nail polish, nail base and top coat polishes, and non-medicated lip balm; fragrances, namely, eau de toilette, eau de parfum, and perfume; bath products, namely, bath and shower gel, fragrant bath soap, perfumed body cream, body exfoliating cream, bath beads, bath oil, body oil, body shampoo, and hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |