Drawing for COMPS PIPELINE

USPTO serial 75732090

COMPS PIPELINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPS PIPELINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell P. Brook

MITCHELL P BROOK BAKER & MCKENZIE101 W BROADWAY 12TH FLSAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009REAL ESTATE AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS PRODUCTS, NAMELY DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF REPORTS FEATURING REAL ESTATE, FINANCIAL, AND INSURANCE INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS, MARKET ANALYSIS, MARKET TRANSACTIONS, FINANCING, APPRAISALS, PROPERTY PROFILES, VALUATION, SALES, AND LEASE INFORMATION, BOTH PROPERTY-SPECIFIC AND AGGREGATED; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING DATABASES IN THE FIELDS OF REAL ESTATE AND FINANCE; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR OBTAINING REAL ESTATE, FINANCIAL, AND INSURANCE INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS, NAMELY VALUATION, SALES, AND LEASE INFORMATION, BOTH PROPERTY-SPECIFIC AND AGGREGATED, AND FOR OBTAINING DATABASE INFORMATION REGARDING REAL ESTATEACTIVE—
016BOOKLETS, REPORTS, AND INFORMATION SHEETS FEATURING REAL ESTATE, FINANCIAL, AND INSURANCE INFORMATION, NAMELY PROVIDING VALUATION, SALES, AND LEASE INFORMATION, BOTH PROPERTY-SPECIFIC AND AGGREGATEDACTIVE—
036REAL ESTATE, FINANCIAL, AND INSURANCE INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING VALUATION, SALES, AND LEASE INFORMATION, BOTH PROPERTY-SPECIFIC AND AGGREGATED; PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE REGARDING REAL ESTATE FEATURING INFORMATION, ANALYSIS, AND APPRAISALS ACCESSIBLE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND PROVIDING DATABASE INFORMATION ON REAL ESTATE, FINANCE, AND INSURANCE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 20001.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Apr 14, 20001.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Oct 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance