USPTO serial 75732174
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD P. KANANEN
RONALD P KANANEN RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PCLION BLDG STE 5011233 20TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2304| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer modeling and measurement services for others, namely, measuring volume, space, location, distance and position of any object or area using spatial positioning techniques; consultation services relating to computer modeling and measurement | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |