Drawing for GOOD SKIN

USPTO serial 75732348

GOOD SKIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2454257Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2001
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD SKIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lesley A. Moradian

BEAUTY BANK INC767 FIFTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICS AND TOILETRIES, NAMELY, SKIN CARE CLEANERS, [ BODY WASHES ], SKIN CARE LOTIONS, SKIN CARE CREAMS, SKIN CARE GELS, SKIN SCRUBS, SKIN MASKS, SKIN ASTRINGENTS AND TONERS, AND NON-MEDICATED ACNE TREATMENT GELS AND LOTIONSSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 15, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2017C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Oct 23, 2017CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 5, 2017CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 2017PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 13, 2011RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 13, 201189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 6, 2011E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2008A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 23, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2008ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 28, 20068.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
May 26, 20068.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
May 26, 2006ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2001R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 20, 2001CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 10, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 25, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance