USPTO serial 75733164
CACTUS CREEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CACTUS CREEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B G HOROWITZ
ROBERT B G HOROWITZ COOPER & DUNHAM1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Candied fruit snacks, fruit-based snack goods, potato-based snack foods, and snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; dips for chips and snack foods | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | cereal based snack food, cheese flavored puffed corn snacks, puffed corn snacks, granola-based snack food, rice-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods, tortilla chips and snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candies nuts and/or popped popcorn | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic bloody mary cocktail mix, non-alcoholic margarita mixes, concentrates, syrups and powders for making non-alcoholic beverages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |