Drawing for IMN2

USPTO serial 75733681

IMN2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IMN2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JASON A. BERNSTEIN

JASON A BERNSTEIN BERNSTEIN & ASSOCIATES PC30 PERIMETER CTR ESTE 121ATLANTA, GA 30346-1902

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs, namely, programs for database warehousing and communications applications to electronically transmit data, messages, test, images, sound and video; and computer programs for video tele-comferencing that enable real time, interactive editing of video images and documents viewed jointly by video tele-conference participants and instruction manuals sold as a unitACTIVE
035market research, consultation services in the field of marketing, database management services in the field of marketing, conducting business research surveys, therefor, educational services, namely, arranging and conducting conferences pertaining to marketing and demographic dataACTIVE
041training in the use and operation of computer programs used for communications and conferencing over a global computer network, arranging and conducting conferences by means of a global computer networkINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED
042information services, namely, providing marketing and demographic dataINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance