USPTO serial 75733780
INVISIBLE SPECMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2729481Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2003
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INVISIBLE SPECMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Greenwald-Swire
Lisa Greenwald-Swire Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PERFORMING QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS IN THE DESIGN OF SEMICONDUCTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |