USPTO serial 75733814
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Advanced Production Systems, Inc.
Louisville, KY
Advanced Production Systems, Inc.
Louisville, KY
Advanced Production Systems, Inc.
Louisville, KY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel T. Beres
JOEL T BERES STITES & HARBISON400 W MARKET ST STE 1800LOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3352UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEM COMPONENT TESTING AND ERROR PROOFING SERVICES FOR OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |