USPTO serial 75735672
NO PITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NO PITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bakerfield, CA
Bakerfield, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing and headwear, namely, T-shirts, tank tops, sweat shirts, athletic short pants, sweat pants, jackets, baseball caps, knit caps, head bands and socks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |