Drawing for EMERALD CITY

USPTO serial 75735697

EMERALD CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMERALD CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANET A KOBRIN, ESQ.

JANET A KOBRIN ESQ WARNER BROS4000 WARNER BLVDBURBANK, CA 91522UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029PROCESSED AND DRIED VEGETABLES; PROCESSED AND DRIED FRUITS EXCLUDING PROCESSED NUTS; PROCESSED GINSENG; RAISINS, FRUIT SALADS, FRUIT JELLIES AND MARMALADE; PRESERVED ONIONS; PRESERVED OLIVES; CRYSTALLIZED FRUITS; JAMS, CHOCOLATE NUT BUTTER, COCOA BUTTER AND PEANUT BUTTER; CANNED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; PICKLES; SOYBEAN-BASED FOOD BEVERAGE USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE; FROZEN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; POTATO CHIPS; PROCESSED AND DRIED MEAT; MEAT; MILK; SEAFOOD; AND MARGARINEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 28, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 10, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 5, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance