USPTO serial 75736467
VM:WEBGATEWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VM:WEBGATEWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERRY W MILLS
JERRY W MILLS BAKER & BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-2980UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR CREATING FULL SCALE WORLD WIDE WEB SITES AND FOR PROVIDING A CONNECTION BETWEEN NETWORKS TO FACILITATE CORPORATE-WIDE COMMUNICATION, COLLABORATION AND INFORMATION FLOW, BUSINESS TO BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS AND BUSINESS TO CONSUMER TRANSACTIONS | ACTIVE | Apr 28, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |