USPTO serial 75736552
VANKIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VANKIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFEREY C BRIGGS
WILLIAM A FINKELSTEIN ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN1620 26TH STSANTA MONICA, CA 90404-4060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | creamer, whipped cream-style dessert topping, and soy based food beverage used as a milk substitute | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |