USPTO serial 75736731
REIMA SMART CLOTHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REIMA SMART CLOTHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
38700 Kankaanpaa, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith E. Danish
KEITH E DANISH TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OF AMERICA915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PROTECTIVE CLOTHING | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SPORTS SHIRTS, SPORT JACKETS, SPORT COATS, SPORT TROUSERS, SPORT OVERALLS, SPORTS SUITS, JACKETS, COATS, TROUSERS, OVERALLS, SUITS, PARKAS, VESTS, WAISTCOATS, SLACKS, SHIRTS, KNIT SHIRTS, KNIT SWEATERS, KNIT PANTS, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, STOCKINGS, UNDERWEAR, GLOVES, MITTENS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |