USPTO serial 75737207
EVE.COM THE ORIGINAL BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVE.COM THE ORIGINAL BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam C. Striegel,
ADAM C STRIEGEL BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computerized online retail services via a global computer network featuring beauty, cosmetic and personal care products, clothing, leather handbags, wallets, belts, watches, clocks, eyewear, jewelry, shoes, luggage, perfumes, hair accessories, hats, scarves, hosiery, money clips, cufflinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing information via a global computer network in the field of beauty, cosmetic and personal care products, clothing, leather handbags, wallets, belts; watches, clocks, eyewear, jewelry, shoes, luggage, perfumes, hair accessories, hats, scarves, hosiery, money clips and cufflinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |