USPTO serial 75737356
BART SPICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2845120Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2004
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BART SPICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bedminister, GB
Greenford, Middlesex, UB6, 8UH, GB
Greenford, Middlesex, UB6, 8UH, GB
Greenford, Middlesex, UB6, 8UH, GB
CENTRAL MILTON KEYNES, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin A Getz
Nicole M. Murray Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP191 N. Wacker DriveSuite 3700Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; desiccated coconut, coconut flakes, prepared coconut, processed coconut, coconut oil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Preserved and dried herbs, sauces, spices, salt, mustard, vinegar, spice mixes, spice preparations, sauce mixes, sauce powders, processed herbs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BART SPICES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Chadha Oriental Foods Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Chadha Oriental Foods Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Chadha Oriental Foods Limited
- Other trademarks owned by SECKLOE 183 LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BART SPICES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |