USPTO serial 75737715
THE ENFORCER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ENFORCER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile surveillance and recording system, in digital or analog format, to be used in recording and enforcement of Federal and state laws, prison and prisoner transport regulations, and adherence to public transit regulations, comprising a VCR and recorder video cameras, used to view, record and play back any activity that may occur in or outside all vehicles | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |