USPTO serial 75738587
IMATERNITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHILLIPS, DERRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMATERNITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradford S. Breen
BRADFORD S BREEN ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | on-line provision of information of interest to expectant mothers and mothers concerning prenatal and newborn products, and health and safety issues relating to pregnancy and infant care; providing on-line retail services featuring women's clothing, swimwear, sleepwear and lingerie; and a complete line of products for newborns and infants including bedding; toys; nursing and infant feeding supplies; medical supplies; strollers; car seats; carriers; diaper and bath accessories; playpens; swings; walkers; music, books and videos | ACTIVE | May 3, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |