USPTO serial 75738851
EXCEEDING YOUR EXPECTATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXCEEDING YOUR EXPECTATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oklahoma City, OK
Oklahoma City, OK
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PREPARED FOODS, NAMELY, FROZEN AND NON-FROZEN APPETIZERS, HORS D'OEUVRES, SIDE DISHES AND DINNER ENTREES, ALL CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING - MEAT, FISH, POULTRY, FRUITS, AND CHEESES | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | PREPARED FOODS, NAMELY, FROZEN AND NON-FROZEN APPETIZERS, HORS D'OEUVRES, SIDE DISHES AND DINNER ENTREES, ALL CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING - BREAD STUFFING CONTAINING BREAD, RICE, PASTRIES, DOUGHS, SAUCES AND SPICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DFG Foods, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by DFG Foods, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named EXCEEDING YOUR EXPECTATIONS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |