USPTO serial 75739065
CADDIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CADDIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
67301 Schiltigheim, Cedex, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROLAND PLOTTEL
ROCKEFELLER CTR STNP O BOX 293NEW YORK, NY 10185-0293Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | NON-ELECTRICAL METAL CABLE WIRES; METAL WIRE BASKETS, BINS AND CONTAINERS USED FOR STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION; METAL BOXES FOR TOOLS; METAL TRAYS FOR COMMERCIAL USE, NAMELY, FOR FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT; METAL SUSPENSION RODS USED TO HAND CLOTHING AND PLANTS; THREADED METAL FASTENERS; METAL WIRE HOOKS; WIRE MESH FENCE AND GATE PANELS; METAL WHEEL CASTERS; AND PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Carts for self-service shops and stores; household shopping trolleys; insulated transport carts for meat and eggs; folding platform carts; fork lift trucks; motorized baggage carts; airport carts; vehicle wheels; baby strollers, and parts and accessories therefore | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metal wheel casters for furniture, baby chairs, linen cupboards, work sort stations, console tables, display furniture, namely, sales counters and display counters, chairs, furniture other than office furniture, shelves other than office shelves, and parts and accessories for the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |