USPTO serial 75739512
UTILITY CENTRAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UTILITY CENTRAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Southern Telecom, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Southern Telecom, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named UTILITY CENTRAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |