USPTO serial 75739911
SUBVERSIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUBVERSIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia V60 1S9, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia V60 1S9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E RUSSELL TARLETON
E RUSSELL TARLETON SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GRP PLLC701 5TH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATION OF 3-D ENVIRONMENTS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATION OF 3-D ENVIRONMENTS AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; COMPUTER GAMING SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAMING SOFTWARE AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; ELECTRONIC GAMING MACHINES; COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER HOUSINGS SOLD AS A UNIT FOR ACCESSING MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION; AND MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |