Drawing for I'MPOSSIBLE

USPTO serial 75740878

I'MPOSSIBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I'MPOSSIBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM GRANTHAM

WILLIAM GRANTHAM ROSENFELD MEYER & SUSMAN LLP9601 WILSHIRE BLVD 4TH FLBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041production of videotapes in the field of motivational programs and the publication of magazinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 24, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 24, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance