USPTO serial 75741134
OPTIFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
PLEASANTON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
ERIN M CLARKE OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON19TH FL455 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CONTACT LENSES | ACTIVE | Aug 17, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |