USPTO serial 75741258
XELIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, TERESA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XELIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
78520 LIMAY, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter C. Farley
WALTER C FARLEYP O BOX 3HARPSWELL, ME 04079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | construction, installation and repair of waste and residue treatment and valorization units | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | transport gathering and storage of all kind of waste and residue | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | treatment, recycling and valorization of all kind of waste and residue | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | engineering services, engineering surveys of projects (non-business), research laboratories in the field of waste treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SARP INDUSTRIES
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XELIA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |