USPTO serial 75741605
LEXUS MAYDAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEXUS MAYDAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Toyota-shi, Aichi-ken, JP
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Toyota-shi, Aichi-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Kera
DAVID J KERA OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3454UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC PROCESSORS COMPRISING ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNITS, TRANSCEIVERS, MICROPHONES, SPEAKERS, BUTTON MODULES, BACKUP BATTERIES, GPS ANTENNAS, AND CELLULAR ANTENNAS, FOR USE IN PROVIDING COMMUNICATION SERVICES TO MOTORISTS, WHOSE LOCATIONS ARE DETERMINED BY THE USE OF A GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS), BY THE USE OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | NAVIGATION AND GLOBAL POSITIONING SERVICES, NAMELY USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS TO PROVIDE NAVIGATION LOCATION, TRACKING, MAPPING AND TIMING OBJECTIVES FOR USERS BY MEANS OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named LEXUS MAYDAY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |