USPTO serial 75741620
COMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2897518Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 2004
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
30015 Chioggia, IT
30015 Chioggia, IT
30015 Chioggia, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Franco A. Serafini
Franco A. Serafini THEMIS LAW7825 Fay Ave Ste 200LA JOLLA, CA 92037-4270UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | UNDERWEAR NAMELY DRAWERS, CORSETRY, BODY LINEN, BODICES, AND CORSETS; DRESSING GOWNS, BRASSIERES, SINGLETS, CORSELETS, GARTERS, AND UNDERWEAR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |