USPTO serial 75741825
N NEW CENTURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with N NEW CENTURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MORTGAGE SERVICES, NAMELY, BANKING, LENDING AND BROKERAGE MORTGAGE SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by New Century Mortgage Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by New Century Mortgage Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDIVATION LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named N NEW CENTURY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |