Drawing for INDIGO CASUAL GOURMET CAFE

USPTO serial 75742229

INDIGO CASUAL GOURMET CAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2722949Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2003
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INDIGO CASUAL GOURMET CAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Restaurant servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2010C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Jun 9, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 10, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 10, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 28, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 28, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 28, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 18, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 26, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance