Drawing for SUPERTRACKS

USPTO serial 75742309

SUPERTRACKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SUPERTRACKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jere M. Webb

JERE M WEBB STOEL RIVES LLP900 SW FIFTH AVE STE 2600PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downable, including streaming, video, audio, and pictorial recordings, including data and document descriptive of such recordings via an on-line electronic communication networkACTIVE—
035Distribution for others of video, audio, and pictorial recordings, including data and documents descriptive of such recordings, via an on-line communications networkACTIVE—
041Providing an on-line computer database in the filed of catalog identification video, audio, and pictorial recordings, including data and documents descriptive of such recordingsACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing and supporting access to an on-line catalog of video, audio, and pictorial recordings, including data and documents descriptive of such recordings, and providing and supporting search, review, selection, annotation, purchase, licensing, and other like transactions in connection with the use of the catalogACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance