USPTO serial 75742424
ISOMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ISOMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sante-Marie de Beauce, Quebec G6E 2B4, CA
Sante-Marie de Beauce, Quebec G6E 2B4, CA
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CA
Sante-Marie de Beauce, Quebec G6E 2B4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID E. WESLOW
DAVID E WESLOW SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP1275 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | THERMOPLASTIC WINDOW INSERTS, NAMELY, COMPONENTS PLACED BETWEEN WINDOW PANES IN BUILDINGS FOR INSULATION FROM EXTERIOR HEAT OR COLD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Groupe Bocenor Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Groupe Bocenor Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by POLYFORM A.G.P. INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Groupe Bocenor Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named ISOMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |