USPTO serial 75742821
GEKIDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEKIDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sheffield, S1 4HA, GB
Sheffield, S1 4HA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J DAVID DAINOW
J DAVID DAINOW AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER GAMES SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAMES AND VIDEO GAMES RECORDED ON CARTRIDGES, CASSETTES, DISCS, CD-ROMS AND TAPES; MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER GAMES RECORDED ON CD-ROMS; VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS AND TELEVISION MONITORS; AND INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES OF VIRTUAL REALITY COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | ELECTRONICS GAMES, NAMELY, HANDHELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES AND ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL GAMES FOR CHILDREN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gremlin Interactive Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Gremlin Interactive Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GEKIDO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |