USPTO serial 75743687
SMART START
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART START?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Starter solenoids having electronic circuitry programmed for automotive use, namely, anti-theft security, voltage regulation, voltage control, voltage indication, remote start, multi-function disabling positioning, low voltage protection, motion impact alarm, tilt alarm and proximity alarm | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |