USPTO serial 75743690
ERGOSOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ERGOSOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Downsview Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judith L. Grubner
JUDITH L GRUBNER LAFF, WHITESEL & SARET, LTD401 N MICHIGAN AVESTE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | office furniture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |