Drawing for "INTERNET MODULATION"

USPTO serial 75743978

"INTERNET MODULATION"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with "INTERNET MODULATION"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

K. David Crockett

K DAVID CROCKETT22362 ROSEBRIARMISSION VIEJO, CA 92692UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripherals for computers with access to global computer networks, radio receivers, computer software for connecting global computer networks, and computer software for connecting computer network usersACTIVE—
038Radio transmission routing services conducted via a website on a global computer networkINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 5, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 5, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 5, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 4, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance