USPTO serial 75744330
S4/CAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S4/CAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Infrastructures for Information Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2K6, CA
Other trademarks owned by Infrastructures for Information Inc.
Infrastructures for Information Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2K6, CA
Other trademarks owned by Infrastructures for Information Inc.
Infrastructures for Information Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2K6, CA
Other trademarks owned by Infrastructures for Information Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M. Hyman
MIDGE M HYMANN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE PROGRAM FOR WORD PROCESSING APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Infrastructures for Information Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Infrastructures for Information Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Infrastructures for Information Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named S4/CAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 7, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |