USPTO serial 75745124
SHOPSUXESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHOPSUXESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used to track visitor behavior in web sites by analyzing web server log files | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |