USPTO serial 75745126
COMMERCESUXESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMERCESUXESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used to calculate quantitative statistics of web site visitor behavior by qualitative measures, namely, software used to assign monetary values to individual objects of a web site clicked on by the user and then calculate the exact return-on-investment value of the resulting commercial transaction on global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |