Drawing for WARM APPLIED CURABLE ACRYLIC

USPTO serial 75745609

WARM APPLIED CURABLE ACRYLIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WARM APPLIED CURABLE ACRYLIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay Lyn Schwartz

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE & WYNNE, LLP1601 ELM STSTE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001adhesive sealants for aircraft, aerospace, automotive, building construction, architectural, major appliances, plastics and related usesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 7, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 2, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 15, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 12, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 12, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance