USPTO serial 75745624
PRICE FORBES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRICE FORBES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, EC3M 6BN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM R. HANSEN
WILLIAM R HANSEN DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Business management consultation; personnel management consultation | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Insurance brokerage services in the fields of property, transport, professional liability, accident, health, life, utilities; Reinsurance underwriting in the fields of property, transport, professional liability, accident, health, life and utilities; Life insurance underwriting in the fields of life, health and accident; Insurance claims administration and assessment; Offering insurance quotations for others; Insurance research services; Providing insurance information; (Based on 44(e)) Insurance brokerage services; offering insurance quotations, insurance research services; insurance information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |