USPTO serial 75745729
PACKETPATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PACKETPATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Svat
MARK S SVAT FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATION SWITCHES, TRANSMISSION AND WAVELENGTH MULTIPLEXERS, OPTICAL-ELECTRONIC NETWORKS, FOR THE INPUT, OUTPUT, RECORDING, TRANSMISSION AND REPRODUCTION OF VIDEO AND VOICE IMAGES AND FOR INPUT, OUTPUT, PROCESSING, LOGGING, SORTING, TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF DATA; COMPUTERS, MICROPROCESSORS, DATA ENCODERS AND DECODERS, RECORDING DISCS, AND TELECOMMUNICATION SOFTWARE AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |